Ideas that Shock the World

Question: Write about theIdeas that Shock the World. Answer: United Nations (UN) is a large body currently comprising of about one hundred and ninety-three member countries. The body is responsible for peacekeeping, environmental conservation, and many other activities. Specifically, United Nations is a program that was formed back in 1945 to help the involved member countries to spread peace through harmony creation. The body for a long time has been involved in talks with the members more so during the time of disasters. Its inception gave the member a sense of security regarding political stabilization and external threats. This motive encouraged several countries to join the program owing to the fact that it was formed right after second war whose end marked a new beginning of suffering to some nations. Depending on the current form of affairs of the U.N questions on whether the united nation is an imperial power or not have arisen. Therefore by critically analyzing the imperialism of the United Nations body, clear understanding of the sub ject will be achieved. The United Nations program is not an imperial power. Imperial power is comprised of indirect and direct rule (Howe, 2002, 15). To be the head of the UN may mean a lot from a personal point of view but the reality is, there is power attached to the entire body. It is divided into various branches that seem to be independent of the other. If at all the UN could be imperial that could imply that there would be no wars and deaths as opposed to what has been experienced for the last decade. Also, there are member nations who continue to suffer under the wings of the United Nations. To understand the concept of United Nations imperialism, it becomes important to note that all the powers of the body are distributed to the five permanent members: United States of America, Russia, China, Great Britain and France (Morgenthau and Nations, 1948, 53). This implies that to have an effective strategy on how to defeat a common enemy, all of the above mentioned super power countries must come to an a greement. Failure to that means the developing nation might suffer in the hands of the United Nations helplessly for a long time. The United Nation is far from becoming an imperial power. For instance, it has been unable to curb the negative motives of the superpower members; therefore, deeming it questionable as far as the welfare of other countries is concerned. It is evident that before joining the United Nations, the United States of America had a hidden agenda that remained unearthed by the UN members (Xanthaki, 2007, 103). Iraq is an oil field that the US has been willing to conquer and acquire. The former US President George W. Bush identified the need to be associated with the UN because he knew that it would lend the legitimacy of the international community. By this is to mean that the United States domination in Iraq was legally acceptable and fair. Due to the incapability of the UN to identify the US strategy, most of the Iraq residents were killed, and the US slaughter in Iraq continues up to date. In short, UN is a body that cannot in any way stand the interest and the powers of superior nations. Moreover, during the Serbia bombing in 1999, Russia and other superpower nations apart from the United States of America remained calm over the issue (Kim, 2015, 16). What followed was the US ignoring the voice of its counterparts and utilizing that opportunity in the name of NATO to conduct severe bombing that claimed so many lives. The steps by Bush to disagree with the UN on the approaches of Iraq indicates how weak the United Nations is in defending and extending its authority for the well being of the member countries. The United Nations weapon inspection program is a means of promoting killings contrary to its goals and objectives during inception. The Move to disarm the residents of Iraq, Palestine, and Afghanistan by the United Nations has been warmly welcomed by the United States there giving them an opportunity to kill anyone who disagrees with them (Lauren, 1996, 44). The weakness of the UN can be traced back in 1991 when it supported the Gulf war. What followed was more severe than massacre witnessed during the time of Idi Amin of Uganda. Research indicates that Iraq was destroyed with most tonnage at a fast rate ever to have been recorded in war history. As a result, more than two hundred thousand Iraqis lost their lives. If UN was superior, it could have stretched the weapon inspection rule in the US. Another failure of the United Nations was witnessed when Italy came forward to invade Abyssinia (Chesterman, 2004, 36). The British decided to show off their superiority when they falsely act ed as if they were lending Abyssinia, a hand. The deal dictated that the Abyssinia would give a portion of their land to the Italians. The fact remains that the British saw this as an opportunity to secure possession in Africa. The latter followed that the whole of Abyssinia was taken by the Italy and Haile Sellassie was entirely expelled yet no action was taken against them. The United Nation program is ineffective. This is supported by the fact that the body for a long time has failed to act according to specifically when crisis happen. In 1968 hijacking of Israel airplane marked a new turn of event in the terrorism arena (Mazower, 2009, 8). The United Nations responded by condemning the act, but no particular action was taken to curbing the vice. This saw terrorists extend their atrocity for a long time due to the quietness of the UN. Later, UN came in and punished the wrong doers. The fact remains that terrorism in Asian continent is a state funded program with the support of most UN members in the region. Failure to hold accountable member countries such as Iran and India remain a great concern. When UN was formed, only the United States of America had managed to have produced nuclear weapons. In the early 1970s, the nonproliferation treaty on the production of the nuclear weapon was passed. This would restrict the super power and other nations from producing nuclear warheads that threatened the welfare of the citizens. Currently, the proliferation treaty has been ignored and countries such as North Korea, US and Israel continue manufacturing such weapons therefore exposing UN failure to enforce its rules. The bloody civil war that was witnessed in Sri Lanka between 1983 and 2009 again proved the United Nations inferiority. The battle comprised of the government forces against the separatist's Tamil Tigers (Louis, 1978, 1943). According to the research, one hundred and ninety-six people were compelled to flee while about fifty thousand civilians were trapped. Due to the intensity of the war that went on claiming many lives, a group of experts staged a need to have the United Nations head of human right to have a say on the issue (Call, 2008, 1499). Unfortunately, UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon appreciated the fact that he was shocked by the situation but he did not conduct any intervention to help the suffering civilians. The UN peacekeepers for a long time have been condemned for child sex abuse incidents. It is evident that people see the soldiers in their helmets that are postulated to be a sign of peace. Unfortunately, this appeared different from the expectations of many nations in the early and late 19090s.Studies show that countries such as Haiti and Bosnia recorded a high rate of child sex abuse by the peacekeepers that rewarded young girls with small coins (Gilley, 2006, 514). The senior leaders in the United Nations did not condemn the claiming that it would hinder other nations from uniting the peacekeeping groups. Conclusively, it is evident that the United Nations is not an imperial power. It is true that the UN follows some laid procedures that guide their actions. Apart from that, the body has been depicted as weak in monitoring the actions of the NATO group. Therefore, it is crucial for the UN to revise its rules and implement them fully for the wellbeing of its citizens. References Call, C.T., 2008. The fallacy of the Failed State.Third World Quarterly,29(8), pp.1491-1507. This analyzes the civil war. Specifically Sri Lanka is discussed Chesterman, S., 2004.You, the people: the United Nations, transitional administration, and state-building. Oxford University Press on Demand. The reference illuminates on the steps UN has taken to achieve transitions. History of the UN failure to control NATOs Great Britain and Italy is analysed. Gilley, B., 2006. The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries.European Journal of Political Research,45(3), pp.499-525. The source critically highlights how the UN members break the rules of the program. In this case child abuse is highlighted Howe, S., 2002.Empire: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford. The article explains the meaning of imperialism.It explains who the imperialist is. Kim, S.S., 2015.China, the United Nations and world order. Princeton University Press.The reference illustrates the UN activities in china. There is also mention of US war superiority in Asia Lauren, P.G., 1996.Power and prejudice: the politics and diplomacy of racial discrimination. Westview Press. Racial discrimination is highlighted.US is discussed in deep regarding deaths of Iraqis Louis, W.R., 1978.Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire, 1941-1945. New York: Oxford University Press. The source emphasizes on US superiority. This is in terms of deadly weapon contrary to UN rules. Mazower, M., 2009.No enchanted palace: the end of empire and the ideological origins of the United Nations. Princeton University Press. This reference highlights weaknesses of UN. Failure to combat terrorism is discussed. Morgenthau, H. and Nations, P.A., 1948. The struggle for power and peace.Nova York, Alfred Kopf. The reference specifies the UN members. It highlights five NATO members. Xanthaki, A., 2007.Indigenous rights and United Nations standards: self-determination, culture and land(Vol. 52). Cambridge University Press. This explains the guidelines of UN body. There is also mention of US self interest in the UN program